Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Three things jumped into my head on reading this (kalliel's entry here). Hopefully I can remember them long enough to type them. (Spoiler alert...I didn't.)

Seems to me that for a discussion to take place in a space like LJ, it almost harkens back to the days of long distance conversations taking place over a lot of time by way of handwritten letters sent by post. It flies in the face of the appearance of modern communication happening with the click of a button. I might post a response to your post and when you get time to read it and respond, the digital landscape we're operating in has changed not unlike it would if my life were to move on while I wait for your return letter. It's not at all like a discussion in class where you have an instant exchange of ideas accompanied by body language and an immediate ability to modify an idea as the conversation evolves.

The closest online thing to that classroom discussion seems to be something like Skype where you get almost all of the facets of communication you'd get in person. The more you pull out those facets, like body language cues going by the wayside in a phone conversation, the more you leave behind the ability to discuss like you would in a face to face setting. I think people still want those discussions and so we might try to engage each other through technology where the interaction feels as though it is happening in the compact time a face to face discussion might happen, 'real time' as it were. But what we've done with our technology is put a word or even character limit on the responses we can give through these immediate things like twitter so while we've tried to add a facet back in, we've curtailed another. We're not far off the word limit of a telegraph message. To make up for that, we've created platform specific shortcut languages. Add in the complication that many of these platforms are designed to propel our comments out for public consumption and you have these languages intersect with group specific vocabularies or communication traditions and it is like having to learn a new language each time you wish to engage in a discussion with a group all the while feeling that you are engaging in public performance art. As for a connection with an academic setting, that's not too far off a discussion in an upper level philosophy class which requires background knowledge and reading and an understanding of the way the topic is approached by the group. How do I say what I want to say and communicate my thought so it is understood and gets me class participation points but at the same time doesn't piss off the prof and wreck my grade? To comment on a platform like LJ where you have the space to express a thought in more than 140 characters feels like you've just written a dissertation level paper. (Or I can't even work with the character limit on LJ and commit massive irony.)

Interacting with me or anyone else in an online setting means that you are trying to have a discussion with someone that you might only know as an icon and the collected persona you've assigned me after reading my previous posts and comments. You can't add in the details that I have dirty hands from hours spent in the garden or that I am wearing a Che or Bob Marley shirt or a suit and tie. You can't see that I have nasty things written about Kant on my shoes or that I'm 80 or 12 or a dog on the internet. All pieces of info you would normally filter my words through when you evaluate my comments during a discussion. That doesn't mean that there is no way to have great discussions through an online platform, it just makes the interaction different. To have the kind of discussion we want, I think we need to figure out which pieces of communication we've sacrificed that we most want back to get the resulting better discussion. Then we figure out how to address those specifics. Do we need to be in the same window of time or on a designated thread somewhere? Is it as simple as stating in our journal entry title that we need to discuss something and then treat the comments section as a larger discussion forum than just people commenting back to the poster? Is it something better handled at a community? Do we just chuck all this typing rubbish and have a huge group skype session or conference call after an episode or event or because somebody needed to call one? Or really are we back at needing to speak with all these people face to face? Our letters of correspondence are no longer satisfactory and I must invite all of you to a salon hosted at my country manor for three weeks in the summer. Or we need to gather at the sooper seekrit mine/laboratory/abandoned factory/fan convention to work toward our goal of world domination or a different beginning to S8.

For me, communication online is like being on a field trip at a museum with my classmates. We are free to wander around and talk with each other about the exhibits we are all looking at but at the same time, when I'm in the coatroom crying about the rest of my life, friends drop by with words of consolation. Sometimes we laugh and tell crude jokes about the statue in the foyer of the naked guy on his horse, sometimes we straighten up and analyze some obscure impressionist painting of a guy without a horse or an ear with our art professor and sometimes we are inspired by what we see to create our own stuff. Once in a while we get cheesed because someone ships the guy on the horse with the guy with no ear and we personally just can't see it and what have they been smoking anyhow? Sometimes we just want to know where to get a cup of coffee or find the bathroom or where we can get some of what they've been smoking. Inevitably the interaction comes with its own set of rules and social etiquette which I may more or less awkwardly attempt to adhere to but we want to be there with a group, not on a solo visit to the museum.

And as it often happens, I've also forgotten what I started out to write by this point. It feels like I have taken a huge step away from the topic because...squirrel!


( 11 comments — Leave a comment )
May. 3rd, 2016 12:00 am (UTC)
These are all lovely ruminations. <333

Though I guess I should make clearer re: my original point is that while I think platform-related conventions, etc. are part of the puzzle, they're not the end-all. And I don't think a huge overhaul of how social media functions is in our hands as much as other thing are. With respect to the academic models, I didn't mean to suggest that LJ be literally like a class discussion, or that it should be more real time so as to facilitate discussion, etc., but rather that call-and-response (so often a mode online) can be tedious and unfulfilling, and that even if it seems like a norm for how interaction should work (certainly, most professors feel very interactive if call and response is a Thing in their classroom, lol) it's not actually an end all. At this moment I'm less interested in the question of platform than I am in the effort it takes to have an engaged conversation across any modality.

Other forms of communication are more effortful that call-and-response (and passive scrolling, for that matter, aha). They require a certain mindfulness as to their existence to be, well, brought into existence. XD And I don't think we're psychologically inclined to make that effort unless we consciously want to make it happen. But that effort is where things can get memorable and fulfilling! Which personally I want to be a part of, because otherwise what's the point, you know? There are dishes I could be doing, or toilets I could be cleaning. I'd rather have one good two-comment conversation than spend 50 hours on the Internet doing nothing at all. I just need to figure out how much disappointment I'm willing to endure in pursuit of this. XDDD
May. 3rd, 2016 04:38 pm (UTC)
I kind of thought I was missing the point when I posted this. I would agree that it does take conscious effort to move beyond call-and-response or the passive scroll and click. Watching TV seems to fit in there too. But moving beyond that is way more memorable and fulfilling and worth striving for. Sure there are times when numbly scrolling and sponging up info chucked your way can be all a tired mind can manage. Actually being engaged flexes mental muscles and helps keep them limber though. It feels like exercise and effort but just like jogging or weight-lifting, there is a benefit far beyond the effort required. It helps if you are naturally curious or on a mission to uncover deeper meaning. The hard part for me is that I spend a lot of time just wanting to ask questions and I can get to be like the annoying toddler asking why, why, why. It's like wanting to have a conversation with my mother-in-law that goes beyond the weather or what she had for lunch or what the cat did and explores why she made the life choices she did. For me, I relish a post like yours that encourages thought and comment and communication. Give my brain something to roll around for a couple of hours. It might be why looking at fandom or SPN from a meta level is so much fun. There are plenty of entities out there that count on us being the scroll and click viewers of their advertising or politics or worldview and trying to engage the world on a deeper level seems to be a good antidote. But I hear Biggerson's turducken sandwich is good, if a little gooey. I don't know how to help with the disappointment except to say that when it does work, its awesome enough to wipe out part of the frustration built trying to get there. But then, I annoyingly missed the point of the initial post almost entirely. I did get a thesis out of it and gratuitous use of irony though so I'm happy as a blissful, clueless fly in the ointment. ;-)
May. 3rd, 2016 09:53 pm (UTC)
No, you didn't annoyingly miss the point! You beautifully developed a related one. <3333
May. 3rd, 2016 10:14 pm (UTC)
8-) with a little crack on top....
May. 3rd, 2016 01:26 pm (UTC)
I am kind of in love with your weird museum analogy.
May. 3rd, 2016 04:40 pm (UTC)
My flist would be awesome to take to an art museum....think of the fun! Cackle in glee at the look on the docent's face....
May. 3rd, 2016 05:29 pm (UTC)
Reminds me of the time me and my Mum were in the museum in Athens, checking out the wonderful (naked) bronze statue of Zeus/Poseidon only to have the male museum guard start winking at us and nodding knowingly. I was so embarrassed then, I was only 17! Now I'd find it hilarious.
May. 3rd, 2016 10:15 pm (UTC)
Snicker, but at 17 I'd have died, yeah....
May. 3rd, 2016 01:28 pm (UTC)
I'm kinda of completely in love with your strange museum analogy hun! I want to add something, but the brain is slightly skew-if after only four hours sleep and a night shift last night, but just know, you're head is so cool!
May. 3rd, 2016 04:45 pm (UTC)
There is a quiet bench in the edwardian house furnishings exhibit where you can nap and we'll swing by and pick you up when we head for the 'design and use of plastics as a postmodern commentary on sex and death in the late 20th century' exhibit. Hands you a blanket.....
May. 4th, 2016 12:56 pm (UTC)
Man, that sounds divine!!
( 11 comments — Leave a comment )


Wallace and Gromit
Icarus was a test pilot

Latest Month

June 2017


Powered by LiveJournal.com